January 26, 2004
Present:
Dean Duggar
Dr. Bill Roe
Dr. Sandra Bevill
Dr. David Boyd
Dr. Charles Ford
Dr. Len Frey
Carleen Marburger
Dr. Jeff Pittman
Dr. Steve Replogle
Dr. John Seydel
Others:
Chris Collins
Absent:
Dr. Jim Washam
Mark Young
Meeting was called to order at 3:35 p.m. by Dean Duggar.
Dean Duggar asked that remarks on the Draft of the Code
of Ethics document be sent to Jeff Pittman by January
30th. Dean wants Jeff Pittman, John Robertson and Mark
Lewis to arbitrate and then get the finalized document
to him.
University Planning Committee – ADHE (Arkansas
Department of Higher Education) – formula for funding
the universities. Breaks programs into 4 categories where
they have estimated what the base cost would be. Varies
from certain disciplines that are in the lower categories
to those with more technology equipment involved and then
to the highest which would be engineering. They include
salaries, supplies, and other support items. Allocation
based on lower division, upper division, graduate etc.
If this is adopted and some percentage of this is funded,
then going forward this may influence the priorities on
this campus.
BUDGET PRIORITIES
Dean Duggar announced that AA wants our budget priorities
by Friday. New positions coming from existing or non-funded,
non-existing positions. For instance, Henry Torres is
not in a line and Mary Pat Braudis.
Second part of this is zero budget – what is your
allocation within the college? Dean commented that he
is not in a position to talk about reallocation.
Budget form asks what each department’s priorities
are if new money were available. Dean wants comments from
the committee. We’ve been talking about a person
in
Planning Committee Meeting Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 2
advising (working specifically on undergraduate or assisting
Bill with graduate). Funding or refunding the Finance
Position, additional graduate assistantships (specifically
to develop the new masters programs), supplies. Dr. Seydel
felt that it would be nice to have some funding from the
state for travel for faculty. Dr. Frey felt that it would
be nice if they would help us with our recruiting efforts.
As soon as departments get their pool approved by Glen
Jones, get the people in for interviews and get them hired
as quickly as possible.
Positions – we need to be able to support position
with student credit hours. For instance, if we hire someone
in the Management/Marketing department we need to be able
to support that position with student credit hours.
Future depends on SCH and production. Dr. Replogle asked
if lower SCH numbers in AFL and MM were due to lower sophomore
courses. Dr. Boyd asked if a faculty member is teaching
in Paragould, wouldn’t that decrease our SCH numbers?
Dr. Frey commented that if he is teaching a CVN class
in Paragould, then why would they have an on-site class
as well?
Dean Duggar asked for the committee to rank these by
priorities:
Advising (5)
Recruiting Support (2)
Graduate Assistants (6)
Funding Finance Position (1)
Supplies (3)
Travel (4)
Dr. Replogle stated that at the last meeting, Dean Duggar
mentioned changing the allocation of graduate assistant
positions.
Dr. Allen is looking at the 9 hour workload as a standard
average with some people teaching more than that. We need
to provide her with what we are actually teaching. Average
of 10 in the college. We would then need to offer less
sections with larger class sizes in order to do this.
Credit for the internships over and above what’s
necessary to support Sandra Bevill.
Dean needs Faculty Senate Budget from last year if anyone
has it.
Dr. Allen looking at a different way to awarding promotion
going from a flat dollar to percentage. From Assistant
to Associate 5.5% and from Associate to Full 6%. (DOUBLE
CHECK THESE PERCENTAGES WITH DEAN DUGGAR)
Planning Committee Meeting Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 3
Looking at Centers – Dean Duggar asked Dr. Wyatt
and Susan Allen- if Economic Development is - make it
part of the university budget, not AA budget. Look at
center’s that can be self-sufficient. Gave Herb
Lawrence’s department as an example.
UPC to hear requests. Everyone wants big money –
Rick Stripling ½ Million for his area. No net increase
in students and everyone wants more people and more money
– this is a real problem.
PRT CRITERIA
Dr. Ford discussed the PRT Criteria. PRT Process Suggestions
were distributed to each committee member.
#2 – Dr. Seydel suggested clarifying instructional
development.
EX: Dr. Bevill – been here 3 yrs – 7 good
publications, teaches classes well and everyone likes
her – why not tenure her?
Standardized resume, etc.? Phase in the Merit Document,
standard reporting. Dr. Seydel suggested looking at the
University’s standard reporting.
Meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
Next meeting scheduled for February 9, 2004 at 3:30 p.m.
in the COB Conference Room BU105.
Submitted by:
Chris Collins